Well done.
^ Clearly proves my point
And as for the frog event:
These are the prices on monday 57.2g avg
After the patch gets announced prices go down again. and you can see the big price decline as people start making use of the new âexploitâ
Now that AGS took action prices are stabilsing again.
Nothing from what iâve said is missinformation. You could make use out of the exploit as a player who didnt get the mats from the frog event as well. Prices are still lower than what they were before the frog.
I was referring to Great Honor Leapstones, mainly because they are the ones I am interested in for the Artist.
Chests are linked to the character even when opened, just read. you didnât win + weeks but you lost. in short you will only have two weeks of materials when your artist arrives in the game, and your 7 characters will be of no use to help the frogâs materials farming.
but our prices are terrible due to bots. You canât call that normal. Take a good look at the crystal exchange, and call that normal. The very ones who are controlling the market of shards are bots. Rmters are stacked with shard bags for a reason.
The first part out of context sure, but then to specify the random chests exclusively and not the chests inside makes zero sense, if theyâre all locked then why can I still move and use the Leapstone chests that came from the Random chest? Regardless one of us will be right and one will be wrong on Tuesday. Weâll have to wait and see because its clear neither side will convince the other
The ones already opened are, by Roxxâ words, âdone forâ. They canât link X amount of those chests to a Y amount of random ones since there is a rng factor in addition to the scenario that the person has opened some of the chests already.
If a person has 10 Leapstones chests, they could have come from 5 random ones, or 2 very lucky. How much gold do they refund to that person. And what if they can track that easily but the person has used some. Sure they could refund proportionally but thats just too much work.
Again, its mainly because this whole debacle wouldnt have made sense were they to let the chests roster bound in the end. Or at the very least they only would have talked about the shards one and not the three of them.
Iâm not here to convince anyone, I show you what is explicitly explained. you donât even have to make the effort to think about it.
âIâm going to put the chests bound to character, but the materials inside the chest will be bound to rosterâ
Do you even read the patch? The problem with all this is exactly that they donât want it to be bound to roster between characters
lol it gets hard having to explain the basics, being that the only reason for all this mess is because the materials were bound to roster and will now be bound to character.
The only fair solution unless they can rollback some honings. And 24x10 roster limit.


