Recently I’ve seen a lot of debate on the rate of content coming out in the game. I lean more towards the side of people wanting content sooner but I would genuinely like to understand the view points of the “catching up” stance and maybe change my current perspective on the situation. I’m not great at writing so in order to keep things clear and concise I’ll just list points of confusion I have and if anyone has perspectives on any of them preferably that differ from my own please share your thoughts with me to help me understand. Thanks
-I dont understand what people mean by pressured to “keep up” or “fall behind” and specifically why it matters. The scenario I’ve been seeing lately is “if they release valtan right after argos I won’t be ready.” But it confuses me what people mean by “be ready” or why its not just something else to do when they are ready. Is it different from if valtan and argos were already in the game on release and if so please help me to understand how so. More confusing to that though, is in the same complaint I see people saying “they made it so hard to access its only for the extreme whales” but then wouldn’t that mean theyre in the same boat as 97% of the player base in which case they would be “caught up” with a majority of people? Or am i misunderstanding something?
-Second point of confusion is more related to ethics and just trying to understand view points people have in this debate through everyday situations. Idk how to really summarize this thought so I’ll just list a few examples to start. If a lot of people can’t afford a car that doesn’t ever stop the car from being designed or manufactured. If people are allergic to or cant afford a certain food that doesn’t really ever affect a restaraunt from developing, creating, and serving their menu. If some people are busy at work and don’t have time to catch up with a tv series or something similar that doesn’t stop the series from being released. So my confusion in terms of societal ethics is why or what makes lost ark different. What mechanism excludes it from the societal norms of morality and ethics that are generally accepted. (also I’m sure there might be an example of instances where this is not the case but I personally after thinking for a very long time could not think of one so if you do have one please share).
-Third thing that confuses me is a whale/tryhard accessing content atleast as far as my basic understand goes does not really affect the person that isn’t there yet. So to me if we look at both complaints on one end the people wanting content to be slower on the other end people wanting more content now it seems to me that the side wanting content to slow doesn’t really gain anything by slowing content aside from taking away something from the people that are there whereas the people at the top are not bothering the people at the bottom. Its a confusing thing for me to hold more weight to the complaint that takes from someone else while in turn not actually gaining anything. To me it just seems petty but I might very well be missing perspective on this hence me writing this post in hopes of better understanding.
Any thoughts to help my brain untangle all of these confusing things I’ve been seeing recently are greatly appreciated. Thanks in advance for your time and perspectives if you do decide to respond.
