Amazon’s website “Release” page shows Aprils update has been released. Someone forgot to tell the person running the website that the patch has been delayed.
So there is your proof that amazon is lying saying they never intended this week to be the April update. Not sure why they can’t just own up to the fact they had to delay it instead of lying.
I don’t see anywhere on that page that shows it has been released, I see “A new class arrives” which leads me to believe a new class will be here in April. We’re about halfway through April.
Wouldn’t it usually it’d be “Upcoming Releases” to avoid any kind of confusion since it does not have to mean future?
I mean overall it doesn’t matter, if anything it is just a bit funny. You know the one intern in charge of website management actually did their job on time and now is in trouble lol
The word Releases implies both things that have been released and things also yet to be released. Agreed its not good wording but it does seem to be used in a context of “heres a list of all releases regardless of when they came out”.
What they should do is split the page so theres a section with already Released Content and another section titled Upcoming Content
Some of the most boring and interesting discussions were always a group of drunk professors arguing at my bar. I know my English is not great…it’s why I got into programming.
I fall under “bad wording” myself since now that they’re actually teasing Glaivier officially, they can have that big info page with the class, South Vern, and the Proving Grounds stuff.
I did see that page. That’s why I also actually went to look at April’s big info page listing all the stuff coming with the April patch.
Seeing as how I didn’t bother looking at the website until now, knowing Argos is there doesn’t help prove things one way or the other. As far as I know, they could’ve done the same thing: put the page up before it was actually out.